← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Masotta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Shamrocks U16 JWHL-U16 9 11 7 18 2.000 0.4356 0.4356
2017-18 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 25 19 10 29 1.160 0.4355 0.4355
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 26 13 21 34 1.308
2023-24 Plattsburgh State D3 28 13 24 37 1.321
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 28 13 24 37 1.321
2022-23 Plattsburgh D3 SR 29 15 16 31 1.069
2022-23 Plattsburgh State D3 29 15 16 31 1.069
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 29 15 16 31 1.069
2021-22 Norwich D3 23 12 14 26 1.130
2020-21 Norwich D3 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Norwich D3 27 11 22 33 1.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.22
2019-20 · Norwich
+227.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1246
Forward overall
#55
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.