IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hailey Holland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Aberdeen Cougars USHS-W 18 13 8 21 1.167 0.3508 0.3508 — —
2014-15 Aberdeen Cougars USHS-W 21 38 24 62 2.952 0.8878 0.8878 — —
2015-16 Aberdeen Cougars USHS-W 21 47 30 77 3.667 1.1026 1.1026 — —
2016-17 Aberdeen Cougars USHS-W 21 47 36 83 3.952 1.1885 1.1885 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 27 19 11 30 1.111
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 30 20 16 36 1.200
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 31 13 27 40 1.290
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 5 2 4 6 1.200
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 28 19 10 29 1.036
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2019-20 · Gustavus Adolphus
-16.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#58
Forward overall
#3
Forward born in 2000
#3
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
1.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
1.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.09 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.