IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Puumala Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 28 3 3 6 0.210 0.1303 0.1303 — —
2018-19 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 29 1 1 2 0.070 0.0434 0.0434 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 27 12 16 28 1.037
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 27 10 15 25 0.926
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 22 10 16 26 1.182
2020-21 Becker D3 — — 12 6 9 15 1.250
2019-20 Becker D3 — — 26 11 13 24 0.923
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2019-20 · Becker
+1279.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11348
Forward overall
#812
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
Katie McMillan
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lucy Burton
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mallory Rushton
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Presley Norby
Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie McMillan
Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.