IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anya Hafiz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 15 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 3 5 8 0.348 0.0525 0.0525 — —
2013-14 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 8 11 19 0.760 0.1148 0.1148 — —
2014-15 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 6 7 13 0.542 0.0818 0.0818 — —
2015-16 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 13 15 28 1.120 0.1691 0.1691 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 25 13 8 21 0.840
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 25 13 8 21 0.840
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 25 8 4 12 0.480
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 19 8 5 13 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2016-17 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+495.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6125
Forward overall
#1388
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Chancellor
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.