IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Flynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2016-17 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604 — —
2017-18 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 12 7 19 0.760 0.1148 0.1148 — —
2018-19 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 17 17 34 1.360 0.2054 0.2054 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 10 12 22 0.815
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 24 6 8 14 0.583
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 10 2 3 5 0.500
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 27 8 12 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2019-20 · Augsburg
+411.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5496
Forward overall
#236
Forward born in 2001
#1131
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gabby Billing
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sena Hanson
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Savannah Quandt
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota State ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.