IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Laura Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Worcester Academy USHS-W 27 3 6 9 0.333 0.1002 0.1002 — —
2017-18 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 27 6 15 21 0.780 0.4840 0.4840 — —
2018-19 Worcester Academy USHS-W 23 5 3 8 0.348 0.1046 0.1046 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 William Smith D3 NEHC SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 William Smith D3 NEHC JR 11 2 3 5 0.455
2020-21 William Smith D3 NEHC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 William Smith D3 NEHC FR 27 8 11 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2019-20 · William Smith
+220.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4635
Forward overall
#1602
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Joie Phelps
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Olivia Arkell
Hamline · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashleigh Kowtoniuk
Connecticut College · 2007-08
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Julia Surgenor
Bowdoin · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.