IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Laura Denchfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0181 0.0181 — —
2015-16 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 2 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423 — —
2016-17 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 25 12 13 25 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
2017-18 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 25 19 10 29 1.160 0.1752 0.1752 — —
2018-19 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 25 18 6 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 11 12 23 0.920
2021-22 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 9 7 16 0.640
2019-20 St. Catherine D3 — — 24 13 3 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2019-20 · St. Catherine
+395.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5004
Forward overall
#950
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Antony
Minnesota State ·
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.