Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Rochester Lourdes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 1.200 | 0.1812 | 0.1812 |
| 2018-19 | Rochester Lourdes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 28 | 11 | 39 | 1.696 | 0.2561 | 0.2561 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC | SR | 22 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.864 |
| 2021-22 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC | JR | 28 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.679 |
| 2020-21 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC | SO | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.400 |
| 2019-20 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC | FR | 28 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 0.393 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Gunderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG | 0.171 | Lindenwood |
| Charly Dalhquist | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG | 0.241 | North Dakota |
| Jordan McLaughlin | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG | 0.294 | Minnesota State |
| Caroline Murphy | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG | 0.167 | Yale |
| Christi Vetter | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG | 0.000 | Penn State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rylan Kissel | 2024-25 · 1.11 PPG | 0.577 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Samantha Berger | 2010-11 · 1.09 PPG | 0.571 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Lauren Greer | 2007-08 · 1.55 PPG | — | Middlebury | NESCAC |
| Sofia Pittis | 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG | 0.621 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Nikki Logergren | 2011-12 · 1.24 PPG | 0.500 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.