← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Pohlkamp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544
2016-17 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 20 25 45 1.800 0.2718 0.2718
2017-18 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 8 20 0.800 0.1208 0.1208
2018-19 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 21 13 34 1.360 0.2054 0.2054
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 25 14 3 17 0.680
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 25 8 4 12 0.480
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 24 11 7 18 0.750
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 16 11 3 14 0.875
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 29 6 5 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · St. Scholastica
+158.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3811
Forward overall
#555
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.