Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Washington Pride 19U AAA | JWHL-U19 | 24 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.458 | 0.1779 | 0.1779 |
| 2017-18 | Washington Pride 19U AAA | JWHL-U19 | 26 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.577 | 0.2239 | 0.2239 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Hamilton | NESCAC | SR | 30 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.233 |
| 2021-22 | Hamilton | NESCAC | JR | 19 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.316 |
| 2020-21 | Hamilton | NESCAC | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Hamilton | NESCAC | FR | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.333 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Marmer | 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG | 0.108 | Quinnipiac |
| Aly Tremblay | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG | 0.030 | RPI |
| Jacqueline Kaasa | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG | 0.143 | Bemidji State |
| Lindsay Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG | 0.027 | UConn |
| Nicole Guagliardo | USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG | 0.156 | Mercyhurst |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abigail Chamernick | 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG | 0.500 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Grace Karakas | 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG | 0.417 | SUNY Cortland | SUNYAC |
| Emily Heid | 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG | 0.593 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Kasey Evans | 2010-11 · 1.46 PPG | 0.400 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Ellie Patrick | 2022-23 · 0.92 PPG | 0.636 | Keene State | NEHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.