← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emily Lemker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 3 1 3 4 1.333 0.2013 0.2013
2015-16 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 16 22 38 1.520 0.2295 0.2295
2016-17 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 5 12 17 0.708 0.1070 0.1070
2017-18 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 8 9 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027
2018-19 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 16 28 1.120 0.1691 0.1691
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC SR 19 2 0 2 0.105
2021-22 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC JR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC SO 8 1 0 1 0.125
2019-20 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC FR 24 2 8 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · Saint Benedict
+241.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5902
Forward overall
#1284
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.