IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Thomas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Tilton NE-Prep-Girls 24 2 6 8 0.330 0.2048 0.2048 — —
2017-18 Tilton NE-Prep-Girls 21 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Tilton NE-Prep-Girls 25 3 6 9 0.360 0.2234 0.2234 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 24 0 4 4 0.167
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 22 4 3 7 0.318
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 26 4 5 9 0.346
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 18 2 0 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2019-20 · Salem State
-39.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7664
Forward overall
#508
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Wente
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
Bemidji State ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.