← New Search ↗ Social Card

Allie Bussey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 7 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785
2016-17 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 8 16 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450
2017-18 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 16 15 31 1.240 0.1872 0.1872
2018-19 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 14 13 27 1.125 0.1699 0.1699
2019-20 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 29 18 47 1.880 0.2839 0.2839
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 SR 25 10 11 21 0.840
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 JR 25 4 13 17 0.680
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 SO 24 6 6 12 0.500
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 FR 16 11 6 17 1.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.06
2020-21 · St. Scholastica
+601.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3048
Forward overall
#370
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.