IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Hantge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 12 12 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450 — —
2015-16 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 4 13 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027 — —
2016-17 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 24 18 14 32 1.333 0.2013 0.2013 — —
2017-18 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 21 22 43 1.720 0.2597 0.2597 — —
2018-19 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 24 20 19 39 1.625 0.2454 0.2454 — —
2019-20 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 23 23 46 1.840 0.2778 0.2778 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SR 31 15 31 46 1.484
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — JR 29 13 29 42 1.448
2021-22 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SO 27 17 19 36 1.333
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 12 5 12 17 1.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.42
2020-21 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+558.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2349
Forward overall
#229
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sophia Kunin
Wisconsin ·
0.425 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Williamson
Minnesota ·
0.395 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.