IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Carmody Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 20 14 12 26 1.300 0.3909 0.3909 — —
2018-19 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 20 11 8 19 0.950 0.2857 0.2857 — —
2019-20 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 24 13 9 22 0.917 0.2757 0.2757 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC — 19 3 1 4 0.210
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC — 27 7 2 9 0.333
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC — 27 3 7 10 0.370
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC — 12 4 3 7 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2020-21 · Chatham
+107.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2133
Forward overall
#94
Forward born in 2002
#747
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Molly Strabley
Princeton ·
0.103 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.