icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Armstrong/Cooper High | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.833 | 0.1258 | 0.1258 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.522 | 0.0788 | 0.0788 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | — | 25 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.480 |
| 2022-23 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | — | 25 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2021-22 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | — | 25 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.960 |
| 2020-21 | Augsburg | D3 | MIAC | — | 10 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.600 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.