IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Delaney Kingsland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 22 2 7 9 0.410 0.2544 0.2544 — —
2017-18 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 25 12 7 19 0.760 0.4716 0.4716 — —
2018-19 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 31 8 14 22 0.710 0.4406 0.4406 — —
2019-20 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 30 6 12 18 0.600 0.3723 0.3723 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 23 5 7 12 0.522
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 27 1 4 5 0.185
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 23 4 1 5 0.217
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 9 2 3 5 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2020-21 · Lawrence
+62.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2054
Forward overall
#150
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.37 No data
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota State ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Rooney
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.