IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Megan Rittenhouse Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Westminster NE-Prep-Girls 18 1 0 1 0.060 0.0372 0.0372 — —
2018-19 Westminster NE-Prep-Girls 23 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W — 21 0 2 2 0.095
2023-24 Colby D3 NESCAC — 26 16 12 28 1.077
2022-23 Colby D3 NESCAC — 26 18 15 33 1.269
2021-22 Colby D3 NESCAC — 22 12 11 23 1.045
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC — 2 3 1 4 2.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
2.00
2020-21 · Colby
+6189.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16801
Forward overall
#537
Forward born in 2001
#1586
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Katie McMillan
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lucy Burton
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie McMillan
Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucy Burton
Yale ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lexi Edwards
Sacred Heart ·
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.