IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Carmody Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 24 9 12 21 0.875 0.2631 0.2631 — —
2017-18 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 20 2 5 7 0.350 0.1052 0.1052 — —
2018-19 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 20 5 7 12 0.600 0.1804 0.1804 — —
2019-20 Eau Claire Area Stars USHS-W 16 6 1 7 0.438 0.1316 0.1316 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC — 20 2 3 5 0.250
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC — 27 7 5 12 0.444
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC — 27 11 5 16 0.593
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC — 13 1 0 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2020-21 · Chatham
-40.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6137
Forward overall
#266
Forward born in 2002
#2105
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Madison Woo
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Madison Woo
Brown ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.