IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brittany Foster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 23 17 11 28 1.220 0.7570 0.7570 — —
2018-19 Berwick Academy USHS-W 31 19 19 38 1.226 0.3686 0.3686 — —
2019-20 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 30 16 14 30 1.000 0.6205 0.6205 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 William Smith D3 NEHC SR 17 1 6 7 0.412
2022-23 William Smith D3 NEHC JR 15 5 3 8 0.533
2021-22 William Smith D3 NEHC SO 13 3 0 3 0.231
2020-21 William Smith D3 NEHC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#907
Forward overall
#75
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Megan Dulong
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Baylee Darling
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Erin Davey
Connecticut College · 2005-06
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.