Based on 6 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Lac St-Louis Warriors M18 AAA(W) | QMAAA-W | 28 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.357 | 0.0522 | 0.0516 |
| 2019-20 | Ontario Hockey Acad Juniors | CAHS-W | 51 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.196 | 0.0704 | 0.0704 |
| 2020-21 | Ontario Hockey Acad Juniors | CAHS-W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Suffolk | NEHC | JR | 25 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.160 |
| 2022-23 | Suffolk | NEHC | SO | 28 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.071 |
| 2021-22 | Suffolk | NEHC | FR | 25 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.160 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Calamari | 2013-14 · 0.64 PPG | 0.292 | SUNY Cortland | SUNYAC |
| Maddy Belisle | 2023-24 · 0.63 PPG | 0.286 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Sara Lind | 2010-11 · 0.56 PPG | 0.333 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Aryah Hansen | 2023-24 · 0.48 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Ella Hornung | 2023-24 · 0.58 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.