← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Holm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 1 4 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302
2018-19 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 6 11 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027
2019-20 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 10 14 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450
2020-21 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 5 5 10 0.526 0.0795 0.0795
2021-22 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 6 13 19 0.613 0.0925 0.0925
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC 20 0 3 3 0.150
2022-23 Post D1 CHA-W FR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2022-23 Post D3 CHA-W FR 1 0 1 1 1.000
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC 15 1 0 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2022-23 · Post
-19.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7722
Forward overall
#2048
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2015-16
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.