← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michaela Boyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-16 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Buffalo Beauts · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 27 8 8 16 0.593 0.1971 0.2109
2015-16 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 28 15 9 24 0.857 0.2851 0.2896
2022-23 Buffalo Beauts PHF 16 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Buffalo Beauts PHF 16 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Buffalo Beauts PHF 16 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Buffalo Beauts PHF 16 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Boston College D1 HEA-W 16 1 3 4 0.250
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 CHA-W 25 10 12 22 0.880
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 CHA-W 36 22 7 29 0.806
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W FR 38 5 3 8 0.211
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2017-18 · Clarkson
-4.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2855
Forward overall
#134
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.