IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Harper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Warren Township High USHS-W 28 27 11 38 1.357 0.4081 0.4250 — —
2012-13 Warren Township High USHS-W 11 9 5 14 1.273 0.3827 0.3826 — —
2013-14 Warren Township High USHS-W 13 14 3 17 1.308 0.3932 0.3732 — —
2014-15 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 28 2 1 3 0.107 0.0402 0.0377 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 27 3 11 14 0.519
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 24 4 3 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+98.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3432
Forward overall
#126
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Megan Berg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Morgan McKim
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kali Knutson
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Karin Knapp
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Preston Gabriel
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.