IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Wabick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-14 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
MoDo Hockey · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Balmoral Hall JWHL-U19 24 24 25 49 2.042 0.7665 0.7274 — —
2022-23 MoDo Hockey SDHL 32 2 11 13 0.406 0.4751 0.4716 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UConn D1 — SR 37 13 21 34 0.919
2020-21 UConn D1 — JR 18 3 8 11 0.611
2019-20 UConn D1 — SO 39 8 13 21 0.538
2018-19 UConn D1 — FR 35 12 12 24 0.686
2017-18 UConn D1 HEA-W FR 39 7 12 19 0.487
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.68
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.49
2017-18 · UConn
-28.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#468
Forward overall
#30
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.