← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carrigan Umpherville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Linköping HC · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 25 8 4 12 0.480 0.1802 0.1835
2020-21 Linköping HC SDHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 0.0899 0.0899
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 LIU D2 CHA-W GR 34 3 12 15 0.441
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W 33 3 12 15 0.455
2022-23 LIU D1 CHA-W SR 36 10 17 27 0.750
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W SR 36 10 17 27 0.750
2021-22 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W JR 30 12 14 26 0.867
2020-21 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W SO 12 2 3 5 0.417
2019-20 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W FR 31 19 14 33 1.065
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.06
2019-20 · Long Island Univ.
+577.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7038
Forward overall
#289
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.