IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tessa Janecke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 NAHA Red 16U JWHL-U16 23 21 11 32 1.391 0.2649 0.2750 — —
2019-20 NAHA White 19U AAA JWHL-U19 18 23 11 34 1.889 0.6282 0.6282 — —
2021-22 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 78 46 74 120 1.538 0.5316 0.5282 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SR 31 26 22 48 1.548
2024-25 Penn State D1 WCHA-W JR 38 24 29 53 1.395
2023-24 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SO 38 17 36 53 1.395
2022-23 Penn State D1 WCHA-W FR 38 22 25 47 1.237
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.24
2022-23 · Penn State
+238.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#642
Forward overall
#15
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.