← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mariya Rauf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Washington Pride 16U AAA JWHL-U16 21 1 3 4 0.191 0.0363 0.0383
2018-19 Washington Pride 16U AAA JWHL-U16 24 9 3 12 0.500 0.0952 0.0965
2019-20 Washington Pride 19U AAA JWHL-U19 21 11 8 19 0.905 0.3009 0.3009
2021-22 Washington Pride 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 61 47 50 97 1.590 0.5494 0.5327
2022-23 Oakville Jr. Hornets OWHL-U22 39 22 18 40 1.026 0.3585 0.3237
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC-W SR 36 8 7 15 0.417
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC-W JR 27 6 5 11 0.407
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC-W SO 25 0 6 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2023-24 · Yale
-31.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1132
Forward overall
#38
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.