← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lexi Sung Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Washington Pride 16U AAA JWHL-U16 23 7 13 20 0.870 0.1656 0.1745
2019-20 Washington Pride 19U AAA JWHL-U19 21 2 8 10 0.476 0.1584 0.1584
2021-22 Washington Pride 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 61 19 47 66 1.082 0.3738 0.3772
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 CHA-W SR 33 1 2 3 0.091
2024-25 RIT D1 CHA-W JR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2023-24 RIT D1 CHA-W SO 34 2 6 8 0.235
2022-23 RIT D1 CHA-W FR 32 1 6 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · RIT
-13.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2689
Forward overall
#108
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.