IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexia Aubin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 37 20 30 50 1.351 0.4849 0.4991 — —
2022-23 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 40 11 27 38 0.950 0.3409 0.3353 — —
2023-24 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 60 32 39 71 1.183 0.4246 0.3947 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 35 8 21 29 0.829
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 39 6 18 24 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2024-25 · Colgate
+93.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1598
Forward overall
#44
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.