← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Nishi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-28 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.11
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1276
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.26
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3019
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
90%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Balmoral Hall JWHL-U19 22 3 5 8 0.364 0.1411 0.1353
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Merrimack HEA-W SO 28 1 2 3 0.107

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Vilma Tanskanen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG 0.182 North Dakota
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State
Carly Bullock USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG 0.812 Princeton
Emily Antony USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG 0.444 Minnesota State
Amanda Bäckebo SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.056 Syracuse

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kayleigh Olson 2024-25 · 2.08 PPG 0.167 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
McKenna Sandberg 2022-23 · 1.23 PPG 0.280 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Addison Seleski 2024-25 · 1.04 PPG 0.323 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Andrea Noss 2013-14 · 0.52 PPG 0.667 SUNY Oswego SUNYAC
Lauren Schmidt 2023-24 · 1.07 PPG 0.333 St. Catherine MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.