IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vivian Skibinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Alaska All Stars 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 39 2 4 6 0.154 0.0690 0.0706 — —
2022-23 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 40 2 5 7 0.175 0.0785 0.0766 — —
2023-24 — JWHL-U19 82 4 2 6 0.073 0.0275 0.0270 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6241
Defenseman overall
#648
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Katie Carlson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
McKenzie Sederberg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Buckholtz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Brown
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG
Natasha Rachlin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katarina Seper
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ RPI (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Carlson
RIT ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
McKenzie Sederberg
Minnesota State ·
0.125 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Caroline Buckholtz
Brown ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.