IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddie Kaiser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-10 Country: Canada
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Mary's Academy Prep CSSHL-U18W 25 3 10 13 0.520 0.1191 0.1316 — —
2022-23 St. Mary's Academy Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 9 16 25 0.833 0.1909 0.2014 — —
2023-24 Balmoral Hall JWHL-U19 22 2 3 5 0.227 0.0756 0.0783 — —
2024-25 Balmoral Hall U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 27 34 61 2.033 0.4658 0.4449 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 30 2 1 3 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · Bemidji State
-60.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 34 comparables)

9%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
91%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2345
Forward overall
#61
Forward born in 2007
#32
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.