Based on 30 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | St. Mary's Academy Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 25 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.520 | 0.1191 | 0.1316 |
| 2022-23 | St. Mary's Academy Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 0.833 | 0.1909 | 0.2014 |
| 2023-24 | Balmoral Hall | JWHL-U19 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.227 | 0.0882 | 0.0913 |
| 2024-25 | Balmoral Hall U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 2.033 | 0.4658 | 0.4449 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Bemidji State | CHA-W | FR | 30 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.100 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dana Rasmussen | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG | 0.167 | Ohio State |
| Phoebe Staenz | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.680 | Yale |
| Bridget Carey | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG | 0.357 | Brown |
| Reagan Haley | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG | 0.108 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Haley Mack | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG | 0.371 | Bemidji State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Thorson | 2023-24 · 1.52 PPG | 0.929 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Celia Midtbo | 2022-23 · 1.73 PPG | 0.840 | Saint Mary's (MN) | MIAC |
| Ciara Wall | 2019-20 · 1.60 PPG | 0.897 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Jessica Bird | 2016-17 · 2.88 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Rhiannon Ashworth | 2024-25 · 3.08 PPG | 0.440 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.