IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ava Thomas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U 19U-AAA-W 74 54 66 120 1.622 0.5603 0.5952 — —
2023-24 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U 19U-AAA-W 55 53 26 79 1.436 0.4963 0.4952 — —
2024-25 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U JWHL-U19 21 38 22 60 2.857 0.9503 0.8982 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HEA-W — 35 19 27 46 1.314
2011-12 Boston College D1 HEA-W — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 28 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#211
Forward overall
#7
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayna Tomlinson
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.