← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Teagan Flod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-06 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
Saint Anselm
Verbal NEWHA D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.20
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2354
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.53
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6195
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

10%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
78%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 16U-AAA-W 36 4 5 9 0.250 0.0893 0.0893
2023-24 16U-AAA-W 40 12 8 20 0.500 0.1786 0.1786
2024-25 19U-AAA-W 66 28 27 55 0.833 0.3421 0.3421
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 65 13 13 26 0.400 0.1642 0.1642
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Ivy Dynek USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG 0.000 St. Cloud State
Grace Zumwinkle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 1.000 Minnesota
Jordan Chancellor USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.517 Yale
Jessica Bonfe USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.206 Merrimack
Paetyn Levis USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.176 Ohio State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Greer Hardacre 2023-24 · 1.48 PPG 0.286 Saint Benedict MIAC
Daelyn Williams 2024-25 · 0.80 PPG 0.545 Salem State MASCAC
Drew Kopek 2022-23 · 1.04 PPG 0.417 SUNY Cortland SUNYAC
Maggie Hunter 2023-24 · 0.46 PPG 0.931 Norwich LittleEast
Emma Silkey 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.