← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sophie Urquhart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-06-14 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Concordia
Verbal MIAC D3W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.20
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2388
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.53
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6224
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

32%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
60%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2025-26 Rothesay Netherwood School JWHL-U19 13 5 3 8 0.615 0.2388 0.2388
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kiki Radke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG 0.273 Bemidji State
Brooke Madsen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG 0.600 Penn State
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State
Sara Hjalmarsson SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.657 Providence
Demi Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG 0.250 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Hannah Grabianowski 2024-25 · 1.23 PPG 0.517 St. Norbert NCHA
Addie Fee 2024-25 · 1.27 PPG 0.480 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Claire Riestenberg 2023-24 · 1.63 PPG Wisconsin-Stevens Point WIAC
Ruby Eskin 2023-24 · 1.08 PPG 0.552 Augsburg MIAC
Samantha Bogen 2023-24 · 1.48 PPG 0.400 St. Catherine MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.