icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 16 | 22 | 21 | 43 | 2.688 | — | — | — | — |
| 2008-09 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 6 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 1.333 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 22 | 23 | 23 | 46 | 2.091 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 23 | 15 | 22 | 37 | 1.609 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 26 | 23 | 27 | 50 | 1.923 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 26 | 23 | 27 | 50 | 1.923 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 26 | 23 | 27 | 50 | 1.923 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 26 | 23 | 27 | 50 | 1.923 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 26 | 23 | 27 | 50 | 1.923 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 26 | 23 | 27 | 50 | 1.923 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Montréal Victoire | PWHL | 30 | 19 | 7 | 26 | 0.867 | — | — | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 26 | 23 | 27 | 50 | 1.923 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Boston University | D1 | HEA-W | SR | 32 | 27 | 27 | 54 | 1.688 |
| 2012-13 | Boston University | D1 | HEA-W | JR | 35 | 19 | 36 | 55 | 1.571 |
| 2011-12 | Boston University | D1 | HEA-W | SO | 16 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 1.562 |
| 2010-11 | Boston University | D1 | HEA-W | FR | 28 | 24 | 23 | 47 | 1.679 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.