| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Markham Thunder | CWHL | 30 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 0.900 | — | — | — | — |
| 2008-09 | Markham Thunder | CWHL | 30 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 0.700 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 13 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 0.846 |
| 2004-05 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 33 | 27 | 21 | 48 | 1.454 |
| 2003-04 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC-W | SO | 34 | 21 | 26 | 47 | 1.382 |
| 2002-03 | Dartmouth | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 35 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 0.771 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.