Gillian Apps Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-11-02 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2007-08	Markham Thunder	CWHL	25	10	13	23	0.920	—	—	—	—
2008-09	Markham Thunder	CWHL	27	15	10	25	0.926	—	—	—	—
2010-11	Markham Thunder	CWHL	26	13	13	26	1.000	—	—	—	—
2011-12	Markham Thunder	CWHL	27	19	20	39	1.444	—	—	—	—
2012-13	Markham Thunder	CWHL	23	14	10	24	1.044	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2006-07	Dartmouth	D1	ECAC-W	SR	31	30	16	46	1.484
2004-05	Dartmouth	D1	ECAC-W	JR	29	16	26	42	1.448
2003-04	Dartmouth	D1	ECAC-W	SO	23	22	13	35	1.522
2002-03	Dartmouth	D1	ECAC-W	FR	30	22	13	35	1.167

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.