| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Burlington Barracudas | CWHL | 30 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.700 | — | — | — | — |
| 2008-09 | Burlington Barracudas | CWHL | 30 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 0.733 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Burlington Barracudas | CWHL | 25 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.320 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Burlington Barracudas | CWHL | 21 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.191 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Markham Thunder | CWHL | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.375 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Bemidji State | D1 | WCHA-W | SR | 36 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 0.583 |
| 2005-06 | Bemidji State | D1 | WCHA-W | JR | 36 | 8 | 22 | 30 | 0.833 |
| 2004-05 | Bemidji State | D1 | WCHA-W | SO | 34 | 8 | 21 | 29 | 0.853 |
| 2003-04 | Bemidji State | D1 | WCHA-W | FR | 34 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.588 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.