| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Vaughan Flames | CWHL | 22 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.727 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0.500 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 16 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.562 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Providence | D1 | HEA-W | SR | 35 | 18 | 29 | 47 | 1.343 |
| 2004-05 | Providence | D1 | HEA-W | JR | 32 | 25 | 33 | 58 | 1.812 |
| 2003-04 | Providence | D1 | HEA-W | SO | 33 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 0.818 |
| 2002-03 | Brown | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 32 | 12 | 23 | 35 | 1.094 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.