icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Burlington Barracudas | CWHL | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.053 | — | — | — | — |
| 2008-09 | Mississauga Chiefs | CWHL | 29 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.345 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Toronto Aeros | CWHL | 30 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.200 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Toronto Furies | CWHL | 25 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.360 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Toronto Furies | CWHL | 24 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.167 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Toronto Furies | CWHL | 23 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0.304 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Toronto Furies | CWHL | 22 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.136 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Toronto Furies | CWHL | 24 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.125 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Brown | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 35 | 35 | 21 | 56 | 1.600 |
| 2000-01 | Brown | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 29 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 0.690 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.