| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 27 | 20 | 26 | 46 | 1.704 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 15 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 1.133 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 17 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 1.412 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | St. Lawrence | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 37 | 18 | 34 | 52 | 1.405 |
| 2006-07 | St. Lawrence | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 38 | 26 | 44 | 70 | 1.842 |
| 2005-06 | St. Lawrence | D1 | ECAC-W | SO | 36 | 25 | 36 | 61 | 1.694 |
| 2004-05 | St. Lawrence | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 37 | 16 | 20 | 36 | 0.973 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.