← New Search ↗ Social Card

Laura Fortino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-01-30 Country: Italy
Signed Professionally
Markham Thunder · CWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Burlington Barracudas CWHL 3 0 1 1 0.333
2014-15 Markham Thunder CWHL 24 5 10 15 0.625
2015-16 Markham Thunder CWHL 24 8 20 28 1.167
2016-17 Markham Thunder CWHL 20 6 13 19 0.950
2017-18 Markham Thunder CWHL 2 0 1 1 0.500
2018-19 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 5 13 18 0.692
2019-20 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 5 13 18 0.692
2020-21 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 5 13 18 0.692
2021-22 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 5 13 18 0.692
2022-23 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 5 13 18 0.692
2023-24 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 5 13 18 0.692
2025-26 Markham Thunder CWHL 26 5 13 18 0.692
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SR 34 5 16 21 0.618
2011-12 Cornell D1 ECAC-W JR 33 8 29 37 1.121
2010-11 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SO 33 9 32 41 1.242
2009-10 Cornell D1 ECAC-W FR 33 13 21 34 1.030

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.