Sam Faber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-08 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Worcester Blades	CWHL	23	15	15	30	1.304	—	—	—	—
2015-16	Connecticut Whale	PHF	13	3	3	6	0.462	—	—	—	—
2016-17	Connecticut Whale	PHF	18	3	5	8	0.444	—	—	—	—
2017-18	Connecticut Whale	PHF	13	3	2	5	0.385	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2008-09	New Hampshire	D1	HEA-W	SR	35	13	30	43	1.229
2007-08	New Hampshire	D1	HEA-W	JR	38	25	24	49	1.290
2006-07	New Hampshire	D1	HEA-W	SO	33	17	29	46	1.394
2005-06	New Hampshire	D1	HEA-W	FR	37	22	29	51	1.378

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.