Sarah Vaillancourt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-05-08 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2003-04	Pomfret	NE-Prep-Girls	19	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2010-11	Montréal Canadiennes	CWHL	15	11	17	28	1.867	—	—	—	—
2011-12	Montréal Canadiennes	CWHL	14	10	18	28	2.000	—	—	—	—
2012-13	Montréal Canadiennes	CWHL	5	2	1	3	0.600	—	—	—	—
2013-14	Montréal Canadiennes	CWHL	17	12	23	35	2.059	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2008-09	Harvard	D1	ECAC-W	SR	27	25	27	52	1.926
2007-08	Harvard	D1	ECAC-W	JR	33	25	34	59	1.788
2006-07	Harvard	D1	ECAC-W	SO	29	30	26	56	1.931
2004-05	Harvard	D1	ECAC-W	FR	29	25	42	67	2.310

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.