Tessa Bonhomme Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-07-23 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Toronto Aeros	CWHL	26	8	8	16	0.615	—	—	—	—
2011-12	Toronto Furies	CWHL	24	4	12	16	0.667	—	—	—	—
2012-13	Toronto Furies	CWHL	24	4	5	9	0.375	—	—	—	—
2013-14	Toronto Furies	CWHL	11	1	3	4	0.364	—	—	—	—
2014-15	Toronto Furies	CWHL	12	2	2	4	0.333	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2007-08	Ohio State	D1	WCHA-W	SR	35	16	29	45	1.286
2006-07	Ohio State	D1	WCHA-W	SR	33	14	22	36	1.091
2004-05	Ohio State	D1	WCHA-W	SO	30	7	20	27	0.900
2003-04	Ohio State	D1	WCHA-W	FR	34	5	15	20	0.588

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.