icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 20 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.750 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.857 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 21 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.429 | — | — | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Montréal Canadiennes | CWHL | 17 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.941 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 39 | 21 | 19 | 40 | 1.026 |
| 2008-09 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | JR | 33 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 1.151 |
| 2007-08 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | SO | 33 | 24 | 25 | 49 | 1.485 |
| 2006-07 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | FR | 33 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 0.758 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.