Danielle Blanchard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Burlington Barracudas	CWHL	25	6	6	12	0.480	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2008-09	Plattsburgh	D3	—	SR	29	14	23	37	1.276
2008-09	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	SR	29	14	23	37	1.276
2007-08	Plattsburgh	D3	—	JR	27	28	20	48	1.778
2007-08	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	JR	27	28	20	48	1.778
2006-07	Plattsburgh	D3	—	SO	29	24	27	51	1.759
2006-07	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	SO	29	24	27	51	1.759
2005-06	Plattsburgh	D3	—	FR	30	21	20	41	1.367
2005-06	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	FR	30	21	20	41	1.367

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.