icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 18 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.611 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Worcester Blades | CWHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | SR | 35 | 14 | 27 | 41 | 1.171 |
| 2006-07 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | JR | 35 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 1.029 |
| 2005-06 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | SO | 33 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 0.818 |
| 2004-05 | UConn | D1 | HEA-W | FR | 34 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 1.147 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.